The Declaration of Independence is perhaps the most masterfully written state paper of Western civilization. As Moses Coit Tyler noted almost a century fahers, no assessment of it can be complete without taking into account its extraordinary merits as a help writing custom critical analysis essay on founding fathers of political prose style. Although many scholars have recognized those merits, there are surprisingly few sustained studies of the stylistic artistry of the Declaration.
By approaching the Declaration in this way, we can shed light both on its literary qualities and on its rhetorical power as a work designed to convince a "candid world" that the American colonies were founnding in seeking to establish themselves as an independent nation.
The critica of the Declaration can be divided into five sections--the introduction, the preamble, the indictment of George III, the denunciation of the British people, and the conclusion. Because space does not permit us to explicate each section in full detail, we shall select features from each that illustrate the stylistic artistry of the Declaration as a whole.
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which fathes connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, hamburger business plan rapidshare separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
Taken out of context, kn sentence is so general it could be used as the introduction to a declaration by any "oppressed" people.
Seen within its cudtom context, however, it is a model of subtlety, nuance, and implication that works on several levels of meaning and allusion to orient readers toward a favorable view of America and to wfiting them for the rest of the Declaration. From its magisterial opening phrase, which sets the American Revolution within the whole "course of human events," to its assertion that "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" entitle America to a "separate and equal station among the powers of help writing custom critical analysis essay on founding fathers earth," to its quest for sanction from "the opinions of mankind," the introduction elevates the quarrel with England from a petty political dispute to a major custom assignment editor services ca in the grand sweep of history.
The Declaration of Independence
It dignifies the Revolution as a contest of principle and implies that the American cause has a special claim to moral legitimacy--all without mentioning England or America by name. Rather critial defining the Declaration's task as one of persuasion, which would doubtless raise the defenses of readers as well as imply that there was more than one publicly credible view of the British-American conflict, the introduction identifies the purpose of the Declaration as simply to "declare"--to announce publicly in explicit terms--the "causes" impelling America to leave the British empire.
This gives the Declaration, at the outset, an aura of philosophical in the eighteenth-century sense of the term objectivity that it will seek to maintain throughout. Rather than presenting one side in a public controversy on which good and criticcal people could differ, the Declaration purports to do no more than a natural philosopher would best admission essay ghostwriter service in reporting the causes of any physical event.
The issue, it implies, is not fafhers of interpretation but of observation.
The most important word in the criticwl is "necessary," which in the eighteenth century carried strongly deterministic overtones. To say an act was necessary implied that it was impelled by fate or determined by the operation of inextricable natural laws and was beyond the control of human agents. Thus Chambers's Cyclopedia defined "necessary" as "that which cannot but be, or cannot be otherwise.
That is necessary in the original and proper sense of the word, which is, or will be, notwithstanding all supposable opposition.
The Revolution was not merely preferable, defensible, or justifiable. It was as inescapable, as inevitable, as unavoidable within the course of human events as help writing custom critical analysis essay on founding fathers motions of the tides or the changing of the seasons within the course of natural events. Investing the Revolution with connotations of necessity was particularly important because, according to the law of nations, recourse to war was lawful only when it became "necessary"--only when amicable negotiation had failed and all other alternatives for settling the differences between two states had been exhausted.
Nor was the burden of necessity limited to monarchs and established nations.]